
Best Remark of the Day
[LinkedIn, is]
"...more useful in general and for recruiters, but I do have to warn you that they intend to charge for many new features." ~ Shally Steckerl
******
(11:59 AM) Shally: we're talking LinkedIn stuff right?
(12:00 PM) MaureenS: Hey! We're gonna talk about LinkedIn's new changes - Shally - have you heard abt that coming April23 rumor?
(12:00 PM) Animal: I put it on twitter just now - So what's the hottest new thing Shallworth
(12:00 PM) MaureenS: Welcome everyone to the MagicMethod Phone Sourcing Classroom Chat!
(12:01 PM) Animal: The music is Bananiera by Bebel Gilberto because Shally originates in Latin America
(12:01 PM) MaureenS: What have you all experienced with LinkedIn's latest changes?
(12:01 PM) Shally: Nice. only that's brazil. got any merengue? oh. sorry, i said I wouldn't interfere - my bad!
(12:01 PM) Animal: I had to break a search into sections to be able to access all of the returns past 100
(12:02 PM) Shally: i love the new messaging to groups
(12:02 PM) Animal: So I did 3 very specific searches instead of one general one
(12:02 PM) Shally: very cool
(12:02 PM) MaureenS: Shally, have you heard anything about them changing profile access?
(12:02 PM) Shally: profile access?
(12:02 PM) CincyRecruit: I hate to sound like a curmudgeon, but the changes to the Inbox aren't very user friendly & not being able to export group members is a pain!
(12:02 PM) Animal: No, Elvis you can comment on the music. I'm pleased that you know the song
(12:02 PM) MaureenS: Steven Abate wrote (over on that LI post I put up):
"Here is some info on a change that has not yet been rolled out. I found out the other day while speaking with a LI account representative that on 4/23, LI is changing the amount of profile views that will be allowed to free account members. As I understand, free users are allowed to click on and view up to 100 profiles a day. Effective 4/23, that number is going to be reduced to 60 profile views per month. I am curious as to what all of your thoughts are on this.”
(12:02 PM) Shally: i love Bebel.
((12:03 PM) Animal: Shally what is wrong with the new LI rules
(12:03 PM) Shally: nothing's wrong, its good.
(12:03 PM) Animal: That's a good starting point
(12:03 PM) MaureenS: CincyR -I am very upset about not being able to export group members!
(12:03 PM) Shally: when they ask to join you can see their address
(12:03 PM) MaureenS: What is all good Shally?
(12:03 PM) Shally: also you can send them a list and ask them to fill out a survey, or join your list - i operate with the assumption that when there's change i can be among the first to take advantage of it
(12:04 PM) braingain: I am open to change. The changes are not great though
(12:04 PM) MaureenS: Shally, you think the new changes are good?
(12:04 PM) Shally: yes, they are
(12:05 PM) braingain: I'm with you shally on that
(12:05 PM) MaureenS: I get that Shally (first in stuff)
(12:05 PM) Shally: discussions on LinkedIn are so full of spam
(12:05 PM) ANIMAL: Elaborate Elvis please
(12:05 PM) SJDelaney: Hello Animal
(12:05 PM) ANIMAL: What's good
(12:05 PM) CincyRecruit: Drop some knowledge on us Shally please
(12:05 PM) ANIMAL: Hi Steverino
(12:05 PM) Shally: messaging to groups = LOVE IT!
(12:05 PM) Shally: as a manager you can now reach your group members directly in their inbox - the discussions, they aren't so good, very spammy
(12:05 PM) ANIMAL: I'm a recruiter shally not a manager. how is it good for me
(12:05 PM) Shally: I am a big proponent of groups
(12:06 PM) braingain: shally you need to be there to moderate
(12:06 PM) Shally: did you see my tweets about LI Groups?
(12:06 PM) MaureenS: BUT - here's how I feel. I think there should be consideration paid to early adopters and participators - after all, it's these early folks who help get things going/who help move the platform forward/who lead others... I don't mean money – but I do mean "consideration" - access to the original platform apps that we agreed to when we joined these networks- anyone agree?
(12:06 PM) Shally: you don't get much earlier than me maureen
(12:06 PM) ANIMAL: Shally we know that. You don't have to brag
(12:06 PM) Shally: not what i am saying
(12:06 PM) SJDelaney: LI turns a deaf ear to early adapters and paying customers
(12:07 PM) Shally: my group is number 742
(12:07 PM) ANIMAL: How is it good for recruiters and sourcers. Or bad for them

This classroom episode has been removed to the
"Magic In the Method" courseware site. If you were a participant in this class discussion and would like a complimentary copy of the chat, email me - maureen @techtrak.com and I will email the class to you. Please include the date of the class you'd like to receive and your participating User Name. Without the class date I will not be able to locate the class for you.
******
If you like what you just read and want to learn more about telephone names sourcing, consider taking the only-of-its-kind seminal course available on the subject.
MagicMethod is
brimming with information like this and will show you the inside tips and techniques of true telephone names sourcers! Subscribe today
here.
You need to be a member of MagicMethod Phone Sourcing to add comments!
Join this Ning Network